Ford

Ford v. San Joaquin County In-Home Support Services CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2024C096203California2,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 2/27/24 Ford v. San Joaquin County In-Home Support Services CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

TAMMY FORD, C096203

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

STKCVUJR20190001718)

v.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY IN-HOME SUPPORT

SERVICES,

Defendant and Respondent.

Pro per plaintiff Tammy Ford was employed to provide in-home supportive services to her granddaughter from 2007 until granddaughter died in 2015. Ms. Ford claims defendant San Joaquin County In-Home Supportive Services owes her wages for services she provided. After receiving an adverse decision from the Labor Commissioner, she sought de novo review in the superior court. The superior court also found that defendant did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.