Howard Tillman v. David Shinn
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HOWARD BLAKE TILLMAN, named as No. 22-16869 Sir Howard Blake Tillman II, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:20-cv-01378-JAT-DMF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAVID SHINN, Director; R. CARR, Deputy Warden; TEDESCO, Unknown: named as John and Jane Doe Tedesco, Correctional Officer II; DAVIS, Unknown CO II; MORRIS, Unknown Complex Warden;
D’ARCY DAVIS; UNKNOWN PARTIES,
Named as John and Jane Doe, Morris, Complex Warden; RODNEY CARR, Deputy Warden; UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as John and Jane Doe, Tedesco,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 27, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.