Max Roberson v. Henderson Police Department
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202422-16721California280 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAX E. ROBERSON, No. 22-16721
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00541-JAD-EJY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Max E. Roberson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Henderson Police Department
arising from Roberson’s arrest and detention and the search of his residence. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Puri v.…