Max Roberson v. Henderson Police Department

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202422-16721California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAX E. ROBERSON, No. 22-16721

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00541-JAD-EJY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Max E. Roberson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Henderson Police Department

arising from Roberson’s arrest and detention and the search of his residence. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Puri v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.