Audrey Kramer v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202422-16690California710 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUDREY E. KRAMER, No. 22-16690

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01585-RFB-BNW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; KENT

F. LARSEN; SMITH, LARSEN & WIXOM,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Audrey E. Kramer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3)

alleging fraud claims related to foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kramer’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.