Audrey Kramer v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202422-16690California710 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AUDREY E. KRAMER, No. 22-16690
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01585-RFB-BNW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; KENT
F. LARSEN; SMITH, LARSEN & WIXOM,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Audrey E. Kramer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3)
alleging fraud claims related to foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kramer’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. under 28…