Alice Wieland v. Board of Regents

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 202423-15339California647 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICE WIELAND, No. 23-15339

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00724-MMD-CLB v.

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE NEVADA MEMORANDUM*

SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Alice Wieland appeals from the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Board of Regents of the

Nevada System of Higher Education (the Board). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court did not abuse its discretion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.