Minkovich

Minkovich v. Corbett CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2024B324319California3,582 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/27/24 Minkovich v. Corbett CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

JAN MINKOVICH, B324319

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22CHCV00377) v.

WILLIAM D. CORBETT et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephen P. Pfahler, Judge. Reversed. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole, Eric Landau and Travis Biffar for Defendants and Appellants. The Cullen Law Firm and Paul T. Cullen for Plaintiff and Respondent.

______________________________ This appeal arises out of an employment-related action filed by Jan Minkovich against Innovative Payment Solutions, Inc., a digital payment services company, and its chief executive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.