United States v. Jamie Richardson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202423-10007California404 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-10007

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00044-KJM-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMIE RICHARDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jamie Richardson appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea convictions, time-served sentence, and 36-month term of supervised

release for use of a communication facility to facilitate a drug trafficking offense,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), and possession of a die and plate designed to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). render a drug into a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.