United States v. Jamie Richardson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202423-10007California404 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-10007
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00044-KJM-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMIE RICHARDSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Jamie Richardson appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his guilty-plea convictions, time-served sentence, and 36-month term of supervised
release for use of a communication facility to facilitate a drug trafficking offense,
in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), and possession of a die and plate designed to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). render a drug into a…