Joseph Taylor v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202422-16654California1,335 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH TAYLOR; et al., No. 22-16654

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-07956-VKD

v.

MEMORANDUM *

GOOGLE, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Virginia Kay DeMarchi, Magistrate Judge

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the district court’s order dismissing the

first amended complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(6). Plaintiffs sued Google in a putative class action, asserting claims for

conversion and quantum meruit under California law, based on Google’s alleged

passive data transfers using Plaintiffs’ cellular data without their knowledge or

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. consent, and without compensation. We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.