In Re: X-Treme Bullets, Inc. v. Royal Metal Industries, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202422-16143California863 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: X-TREME BULLETS, INC.; et al., No. 22-16143

Debtors, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00062-MMD ______________________________

J. MICHAEL ISSA, as Trustee of the HMT MEMORANDUM*

Liquidating Trust,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROYAL METAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 5, 2023** Las Vegas, Nevada

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: RAWLINSON and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,*** District Judge.

Royal Metal Industries, Inc. (Royal Metal) appeals the decision of the

district court reversing the bankruptcy court’s dismissal for lack of standing in an

adversary proceeding to avoid transfers to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.