William Watson v. P Gertz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202423-15450California316 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM WATSON, No. 23-15450

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00072-DLR-DMF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

P GERTZ, Administrative Director of Nursing; NATALYA WEIGEL, Health Care Provider/Doctor, previously named Natalie Weigel, aka per Doc 16 also known as Natalie Weigel; MAUREEN GAY, Health Care Provider/Doctor; ANGEL MERRIMAN, Health Care Provider/Doctor,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner William Watson appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.