Mary Nelson Rogers v. Jp Morgan Chase, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202423-15768California274 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, No. 23-15768

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01954-TLN-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A.; CHASE

HOME FINANCE LLC; MERSCORP, INC.;

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC; LEE

SEALE; K. LEON; KATHLEEN DIPPERT;

SCOTT JONES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Mary Alice Nelson Rogers appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.