Moran

Moran v. Fusion Sign & Design CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2024C095045California7,914 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/24 Moran v. Fusion Sign & Design CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

DAENA SEGURA MORAN, C095045

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CV-

UOE-2020-0007441)

v.

FUSION SIGN & DESIGN, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

This is a putative wage and hour class action lawsuit brought by plaintiff Daena Segura Moran against her former employer, defendant Fusion Sign & Design, Inc. (Fusion).1 In this appeal, Fusion challenges the order denying its petition to compel arbitration. Fusion argues reversal is required because the trial court deprived it of a meaningful opportunity to present evidence establishing the validity of the purported arbitration agreement between the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.