People v. Singleton CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified a possible issue which was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the court erred in finding Singleton was not eligible for resentencing since the sentencing court struck the prison prior in 2001. We have reviewed the record as required by Wende and Anders, including the many pages of materials submitted by Singleton. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Singleton on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Singleton’s petition for resentencing is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

CASTILLO, J.

RUBIN, J.

3