People v. Carson CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2024E080236California4,456 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant William Carson appeals from the trial court’s finding that

he violated his parole conditions by failing to report to his parole agent within one

working day of his release from custody. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant’s criminal history includes eight felony convictions and eight

misdemeanor convictions, dating back to 1987. In January 1994, he was convicted of

committing a lewd and lascivious act against a child under 14 (Pen. Code,1 § 288,

subd. (a)), and, as a result, he was required to register as a sex offender.

In July 2020, defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance

(Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)(1)) and failure to register as a sex offender

(§ 290.018, subd. (b)(1)). He was sentenced to 32 months in prison and subsequently

released on parole under specified conditions, including that he participate in continuous

GPS (Global Positioning System) monitoring and that he report to his parole agent “on

the first working day” following his release from custody. On August 18, 2022,

defendant was returned to county jail for 180 days for absconding and disabling his GPS

device.

On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.