Hardiman

Hardiman v. The Woodlands Store CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2024A166704California4,963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/24 Hardiman v. The Woodlands Store CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ROY HARDIMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A166704 v. THE WOODLANDS STORE, INC., (Marin County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. CIV220179)

This appeal involves a dispute over an appraisal of plaintiffs Roy and Janet Hardiman’s (Hardimans) 15-percent ownership interest in a grocery business owned and operated by defendant The Woodlands Store, Inc. (Woodlands). The Hardimans challenge the superior court’s decision to deny their petition to vacate the appraisal–arbitration award and to confirm the award in favor of Woodlands. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1286.2, 1285.)1 They reason that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.