Rosales

Rosales v. Janelle S. CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2024B322055California2,620 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/24 Rosales v. Janelle S. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ASTRID ROSALES, B322055

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LF005708) v.

JANELLE S.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Firdaus F. Dordi, Judge. Affirmed. Rodriguez Law Group, Patricia Rodriguez, and Cierra Wilson for Plaintiff and Appellant. Taub & Taub and Richard F. Taub for Defendant and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Astrid Rosales appeals from a parentage judgment, urging that the trial court erred by refusing to recognize her as a third parent of minor Lila S. pursuant to Family Code1 section 7612, subdivision (c)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.