United States v. Washington

Bad Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202423-372California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-372 D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00279-JAD-PAL-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOSHUA SADAT WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Joshua Sadat Washington appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying compassionate release

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court denied Washington’s motion because he had not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.