Head
United States v. Head
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-831 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00093-KJM-AC-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CHARLES HEAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Charles Head appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to modify his restitution order under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Head contends his restitution order is internally inconsistent because it
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). requires restitution to be paid both in an immediate…