Lexington Insurance Company v. Cindy Smith
94 F.4th 870
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202422-35784California7,123 words
Opinion
Opinion
McKeown, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEXINGTON INSURANCE No. 22-35784
COMPANY; HOMELAND
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW D.C. No. YORK; HALLMARK SPECIALTY 3:21-cv-05930-
INSURANCE COMPANY; ASPEN DGE
SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY; ASPEN INSURANCE UK
LTD; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT OPINION
LLOYD'S, LONDON AND LONDON
MARKET COMPANIES
SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO.
PJ193647; CERTAIN
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S,
LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY
NO. PJ1900131; CERTAIN
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S,
LONDON AND LONDON MARKET
COMPANIES SUBSCRIBING TO
POLICY NO. PJ1933021; CERTAIN
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S,
LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY
NOS. PD-10364-05 AND PD-11091-00;
ENDURANCE WORLDWIDE
INSURANCE LIMITED T/AS SOMPO
INTERNATIONAL SUBSCRIBING
TO POLICY NO. PJ1900134-A,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
CINDY SMITH, in her official capacity as Chief Judge for the Suquamish Tribal Court; ERIC NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Chief Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals; BRUCE DIDESCH, in his official capacity as Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals; STEVEN D.…