Fernando Medina-Castellanos v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202418-72419California893 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO MEDINA-CASTELLANOS, Nos. 18-72419 22-659 Petitioner, Agency No. A093-151-103 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, HAMILTON,*** and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Fernando Medina-Castellanos

(Medina), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of two Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David F. Hamilton, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals (BIA) orders. In No. 22-659, Medina petitions for review of

the BIA’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.