Irons

United States v. Irons

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-683California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-683 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:19-cr-00035-RAJ-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RHETT IRONS, AKA Lucky, AKA Luck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Rhett Irons appeals from the district court’s amended judgment imposing a

reduced sentence of 120 months following Irons’s retrial and acquittal on one of

the counts of conviction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Irons’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.