George

George v. Ingram Micro Services CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 2024D082205California2,692 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/29/24 George v. Ingram Micro Services CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KIERRAH GEORGE, D082205

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. RIC1903685)

INGRAM MICRO SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Carol A. Greene, Judge. Affirmed. Irving Meyer, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis and Baldwin J. Lee, Alexander Nestor and Laila Rashid for Defendant and Respondent. Kierrah George appeals a jury’s special verdict in favor of defendant and respondent Ingram Micro Services (Ingram Micro) on her employment law claims. She contends the court instructed the jury with a special instruction that misstated the law, and compounded that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.