Molina Menjivar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-50California1,741 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORENA GUADALUPE MOLINA No. 23-50 MENJIVAR, Agency No.

A215-674-989

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 7, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BUMATAY and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. ***

Petitioner Lorena Guadalupe Molina-Menjivar (“Molina”) petitions for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to

reopen proceedings to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.