USC
Bryce Dixon v. USC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-55079California1,312 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRYCE DIXON, No. 23-55079
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-05286
v. MEMORANDUM*
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
DOES, 1 to 50 inclusive,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2024** Pasadena, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Before: BOGGS,* NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Following a Title IX investigation, the University of Southern California
expelled Bryce Dixon for sexual misconduct in May 2015. Dixon filed a mandamus
petition against USC in California state court challenging…