USC

Bryce Dixon v. USC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-55079California1,312 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRYCE DIXON, No. 23-55079

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-05286

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DOES, 1 to 50 inclusive,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Before: BOGGS,* NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Following a Title IX investigation, the University of Southern California

expelled Bryce Dixon for sexual misconduct in May 2015. Dixon filed a mandamus

petition against USC in California state court challenging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.