Fox
Fox v. Radonix CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Sanchez, J.
Filed 2/29/24 Fox v. Radonix CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
JOHN DANIEL FOX,
Plaintiff and Appellant, G062103
v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 30-2021-01201867, 30-2021-01203509) RADONIX, INC. et al.,
OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Walter P. Schwarm, Judge. Affirmed. John Daniel Fox, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. J.M. O’Connor Law Group and Joseph M. O’Connor for Defendants and Respondents.
* * * Plaintiff and Appellant John Daniel Fox appeals from an order granting a motion brought by defendants (Radonix, Inc., Shahram Tork, Maryam Golbakhsh) to set 1 aside default judgments Fox had entered…