Ross

United States v. Ross

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-923California239 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-923 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:17-cr-00044-KJM-4 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAYMAR ROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jaymar Ross appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

jury-trial conviction, time-served sentence, and 48-month term of supervised

release for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ross’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.