Gonzalez

United States v. Gonzalez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 202423-1138California316 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1138 D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00567-RGK-2 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CESAR MUNOZ GONZALEZ, AKA

Blanco, AKA "B",

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Munoz Gonzalez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021), we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.