Setele

Setele v. Setele CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 2024C098241California3,413 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 2/29/24 Setele v. Setele CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

SERAIAH SETELE, C098241

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. PFL20200060)

v.

MICHAEL SETELE,

Defendant and Respondent.

Petitioner Seraiah Setele requested a domestic violence restraining order against her husband, respondent Michael Setele. After a hearing, the trial court denied the request. On appeal, petitioner contends the trial court violated the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Fam. Code,1 § 6200 et seq.) (Act) by: (1) applying the incorrect standard for considering abuse; (2) considering statements from their minor child’s counsel;

Undesignated section references are to the Family Code.

1 (3) not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.