Gilbert Riley v. Quantumscape Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 202423-15277California1,067 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GILBERT RILEY, No. 23-15277
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:22-cv-03871-BLF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
QUANTUMSCAPE CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 9, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: R. NELSON, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
The parties cross-moved in the district court to vacate or confirm an
arbitration award. The district court confirmed the award. We review the district
court’s legal determinations de novo, Johnson v. Gruma Corp., 614 F.3d 1062,
1065 (9th Cir. 2010), and any factual findings only for clear error, Woods v. Saturn
Distrib. Corp., 78 F.3d 424, 427 (9th Cir. 1996). We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. U.S.C. § 16 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…