In re L.M. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
L.D. was the prospective adoptive mother of six-year-old Le.M. (Le.) and five-
year-old La.M. (La.). The children were detained from L.D. after the Riverside County
Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) discovered L.D.’s husband had sexually
molested his niece and a female child of the couple’s daycare. L.D. appeals from the
juvenile court’s order removing the girls from her custody.1 On appeal, L.D. argues that
the juvenile court erred and denied her due process rights when it proceeded with the
evidentiary hearing without allowing her trial counsel to obtain the delivered services
logs. L.D. also asserts that her claim is cognizable on appeal because the juvenile court
advised her to appeal by filing a notice of appeal within 60 days, rather than advising her
of the appellate extraordinary writ rights. For the reasons explained, we dismiss the
appeal.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Le. and La. were detained from their mother’s custody in May 2022, after then
four-year-old Le. was found wandering 100 yards from her home. Law enforcement
located then three-year-old La. alone inside the home, which was less than 150 yards
from the…