Martinez Flores v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 202423-145California982 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO MARTINEZ FLORES, No. 23-145

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-836-777

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, *** NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Martinez Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Martinez Flores v. Garland 23-145 application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.