Staudenmayer
United States v. Staudenmayer
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1007 D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00023-DWM-5 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTIE STAUDENMAYER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Christie Staudenmayer appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed upon
her fourth revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
Staudenmayer contends that her above-Guidelines sentence is substantively
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). unreasonable in light of the abuse inflicted on her by prison officials when she…