Staudenmayer

United States v. Staudenmayer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 202423-1007California339 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1007 D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00023-DWM-5 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTIE STAUDENMAYER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Christie Staudenmayer appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed upon

her fourth revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Staudenmayer contends that her above-Guidelines sentence is substantively

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). unreasonable in light of the abuse inflicted on her by prison officials when she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.