Rodriguez Vitela v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 202423-1734California383 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ VITELA, No. 23-1734 Agency No. Petitioner, A098-005-551 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge
Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges
Fernando Rodriguez Vitela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming an asylum officer’s negative
reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
review for substantial evidence the agency’s reasonable fear determination, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo due process challenges to reasonable fear proceedings. Orozco-