Robinson

People v. Robinson

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2024A165379California1,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On March 2, 2022, Robinson pleaded no contest to carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (§ 21310) and grand theft from person (§ 487, subd. (c)). He also admitted a prior serious or violent felony conviction under section 1170.12. After denying Robinson’s motion to strike the prior conviction, the trial court sentenced him to an aggregate term of five years and four months in state prison. Robinson filed his notice of appeal on May 26, indicating that the appeal was “based on the sentence or other matters occurring after the plea that do not affect the validity of the plea. ([R]ule 8.304(b).)” There was no certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

1. A Certificate of Probable Cause Is Required for Claims of Error Concerning Pretrial Mental Health Diversion Under Section 1001.36 Robinson contends that no certificate of probable cause is required to raise his IAC claim. According to him, his counsel committed IAC by failing to request pretrial mental health diversion. We disagree. “No appeal shall be taken by the defendant from a judgment of conviction upon a plea of . . . nolo contendere, . . . except where both of the following are met: [¶] (a) The defendant has filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.