In re D.M. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In October 2020, the Los Angeles County Department of Child and Family
Services (DCFS) took the children into protective custody under exigent circumstances,
placed them with their presumed father, and filed a juvenile dependency petition alleging
the children came within subdivision (b)(1) of section 300.
The petition included Indian Child Inquiry attachments stating the children may
have Indian ancestry. On the first day of the detention hearing, father filed a Judicial
Council Forms, form ICWA-020, indicating the children have Cherokee ancestry, and
provided the name and telephone number of the paternal grandmother. The court ordered
DCFS to investigate father’s claim, specifically directing DCFS to follow up with the
paternal grandmother, father, and “all appropriate relatives.” It also directed DCFS to
“send out proper ICWA notices,” even though DCFS requested it not be required to
perform that task because the children were being released to a parent.
All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise designated. References to rules are to California Rules of Court.
2 When the hearing resumed three days…