Mallett

United States v. Mallett

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202423-418California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-418 D.C. No. 2:02-cr-00416-TLN-AC-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAWANE ARTHUR MALLETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Dawane Arthur Mallett appeals from the district court’s amended judgment

imposing a reduced sentence of 294 months following the court’s order granting

Mallett’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and vacating Mallett’s two 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

convictions. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mallett’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.