People v. Velasco CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2024E082338California100 words

Opinion

statement of the case, and requesting that we independently review the record. Without

suggesting any defect or omission, counsel suggested that we review whether defendant

was sentenced according to his plea bargain terms. Defendant did not respond to notice

of his opportunity to file a supplemental brief.

Defendant’s generic appeal requires no further background discussion. Having

examined the record and completed our independent review (People v. Kelly (2006)

40 Cal.4th 106), we find no arguable issues.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER Acting P. J.

We concur:

CODRINGTON

J.

FIELDS

J.

3