United States v. Ranolfo Rios-Diaz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202421-50062California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50062

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:19-mj-23711-BGS-DMS-1 v. 3:19-mj-23711-BGS-DMS

RANOLFO RIOS-DIAZ,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, FRIEDLAND, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Ranolfo Rios-Diaz appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

magistrate judge’s denials of his motions to suppress his post-arrest statement and

to continue trial proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.