Navarrete-Gonzalez
Navarrete-Gonzalez v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202422-607California1,274 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 5 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CONSUELO EMPERATRIZ No. 22-607
NAVARRETE-GONZALEZ ET AL,
Agency Nos. A209-234-823 Petitioner, A209-234-824
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.
Petitioners Consuelo Emperatriz Navarrete-Gonzalez and her minor
daughter (“Petitioners” or “Navarrete-Gonzalez”), natives and citizens of El
Salvador, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
under the regulations implementing the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.§ 1252.