Navarrete-Gonzalez

Navarrete-Gonzalez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202422-607California1,274 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 5 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONSUELO EMPERATRIZ No. 22-607

NAVARRETE-GONZALEZ ET AL,

Agency Nos. A209-234-823 Petitioner, A209-234-824

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.

Petitioners Consuelo Emperatriz Navarrete-Gonzalez and her minor

daughter (“Petitioners” or “Navarrete-Gonzalez”), natives and citizens of El

Salvador, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the regulations implementing the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.§ 1252.

Navarrete-Gonzalez testified that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.