Sandoval

Sandoval v. Masalta CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2024A167739California901 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/5/24 Sandoval v. Masalta CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

GLORIA CASTRO SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A167739

v. FLOYD MASALTA, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 17-FAM-02440) Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Defendant Floyd Masalta, appearing in propria persona, appeals from a trial court order granting the request of plaintiff Gloria Sandoval for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against him under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Act) (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.). Masalta claims the court abused its discretion in various respects by issuing a DVRO and erred by awarding attorney fees to Sandoval.2 But he has failed to carry his appellate burden of demonstrating reversible error…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.