Campana

Campana v. Saldana CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2024B327132California5,113 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 3/5/24 Campana v. Saldana CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

WILLIAM CAMPANA, B327132

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant Los Angeles County and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC668542

v.

CONSUELO SALDANA et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Christopher K. Lui, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Dennis G. Geselowitz and Dennis G. Geselowitz for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Law Offices of Steve Lopez and Steve Lopez for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent. _________________________ Consuelo Saldana and Mario Campana jointly purchased a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.