Juan-Cano

Juan-Cano v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202422-1275California577 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTEBAN JUAN-CANO, No. 22-1275 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-266-117 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Esteban Juan-Cano petitions this court for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motions to terminate his

removal proceedings and claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

When the BIA conducts its own review of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.