Ibanez-Rosas

Ibanez-Rosas v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202421-1294California591 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CIRINO IBANEZ-ROSAS, No. 21-1294 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-720-475 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Cirino Ibanez-Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this

Court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying

his motion to reopen and terminate proceedings due to a fundamental change in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). law. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

This Court reviews the BIA’s denial of motions to terminate and reopen for

abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.