Bill Gaede v. Michael Delay

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202423-35217California1,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BILL GAEDE; NILA GAEDE, husband and No. 23-35217 wife, 23-35531

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00380-YY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL DELAY; ANASTASIA

BENDEBURY; BIOSPINTRONICS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Plaintiffs-Appellants Bill and Nila Gaede

appeal from the district court’s final judgment dismissing the case with prejudice,

and they challenge the district court’s order denying their motion for leave to file a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). second amended complaint, as well…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.