Bill Gaede v. Michael Delay
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202423-35217California1,595 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BILL GAEDE; NILA GAEDE, husband and No. 23-35217 wife, 23-35531
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00380-YY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MICHAEL DELAY; ANASTASIA
BENDEBURY; BIOSPINTRONICS, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 6, 2024**
Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Plaintiffs-Appellants Bill and Nila Gaede
appeal from the district court’s final judgment dismissing the case with prejudice,
and they challenge the district court’s order denying their motion for leave to file a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). second amended complaint, as well…