People v. Hollie CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2024C097534California3,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 3/6/24 P. v. Hollie CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C097534

v. (Super. Ct. No. 19FE006899)

JERMAINE HOLLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Jermaine Hollie asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Defendant filed a supplemental brief. Having reviewed the record and defendant’s supplemental brief, we have found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. But we have identified a mistake in the oral pronouncement of judgment. We will modify the judgment and affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.