Carrillo

Carrillo v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202422-1536California434 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YENNY CARRILLO, No. 22-1536 Agency No. Petitioner, A097-886-193 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Yenny Carrillo petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision denying her third motion to reopen and reissue on the grounds

that ineffective assistance of counsel prevented her from timely appealing the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). BIA’s December 2020 order denying her second motion to reopen based on

changed country conditions. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.