Carrillo
Carrillo v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202422-1536California434 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YENNY CARRILLO, No. 22-1536 Agency No. Petitioner, A097-886-193 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 4, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Yenny Carrillo petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) decision denying her third motion to reopen and reissue on the grounds
that ineffective assistance of counsel prevented her from timely appealing the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). BIA’s December 2020 order denying her second motion to reopen based on
changed country conditions. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny
the…