Alexandria Mosley v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 202423-55478California1,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEXANDRIA MOSLEY, et al., No. 23-55478

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01976-DMS-AHG v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS MEMORANDUM*

FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BOGGS,*** NGUYEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Alexandria Mosley, Rejoyce Kemp, Berenice Cisneros,

and Bruce Parker (“Claimants”) are four of nearly four thousand individuals who

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.