People v. Osborne CA4/2

Bad Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2024E080145MCalifornia1,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/7/24 P. v. Osborne CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E080145

v. (Super.Ct.No. INF1801872)

HEIDI ELIZABETH OSBORNE, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant on February 27, 2024, is denied.

The opinion filed in this matter on February 22, 2024, is modified as follows:

On page 2 of the opinion, the sentence “The Prosecutor contends the trial court

erred because the delay was due to the pandemic, which was an exceptional

circumstance creating good cause for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.