Tene Carr v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 202422-56135California2,249 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TENE CARR, No. 22-56135

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09112-CBM-JEM v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, CALLAHAN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Tene Carr appeals the district court’s orders granting the

government’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, along with related

evidentiary rulings, in this action asserting unlawful employment discrimination

and retaliation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the determination that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.