Tene Carr v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 202422-56135California2,249 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TENE CARR, No. 22-56135
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09112-CBM-JEM v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, CALLAHAN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Tene Carr appeals the district court’s orders granting the
government’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment, along with related
evidentiary rulings, in this action asserting unlawful employment discrimination
and retaliation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.