James Zuegel v. Mountain View Police Departmen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 202421-16277California1,396 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES R. ZUEGEL, No. 21-16277

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03249-BLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MOUNTAIN VIEW POLICE

DEPARTMENT; PATRICK WARD,

Officer; BRITTON MOORE, Officer; MARCO GARCIA, Officer; CITY OF

MOUNTAIN VIEW,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

James Zuegel appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that his

Fourth Amendment rights were violated when police officers arrested him in his

home without a warrant, exigent circumstances, or probable cause (the false arrest

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claim).1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Lopez-

Valenzuela v. Arpaio,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.